Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
6,824.66
(
0.62%
)
US TECH 100
24,376.00
(
0.55%
)
Dow Jones
48,185.80
(
0.58%
)
Brent Oil
93.96
(
-0.52%
)
Bitcoin
71,898.19
(
0.15%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 79921
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

LowFloatGoat

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 16
Posts 1747
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/09/2005

LowFloatGoat

Re: elsieCat post# 53660

Monday, 09/17/2007 7:12:49 PM

Monday, September 17, 2007 7:12:49 PM

Post# of 79921
One interpretation would be that PBLS fullfilled its part of the lease by making its lease payments. The only additional payments would come from profits that can be directly linked to the lease violation. I'm guessing it would be in the form of restitution and perhaps a fine. I think the the size of damages would depend on how much material the sub leases took out of the mine.

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today