Willy......just some comments (some I tried to send earlier, but couldn't get them sent):
I perceive part of the problems you are currently having with some of the longs possibly due to your choice of wording.
1. If you feel you were 'kicked in the teeth by someone repreenting the company', I assume you are talking about the contract difficulties with the private shareholder who hird you (and the others). In many posts, you indicate that you were not hired by the company. If this is really true, please don't now imply that someone reprsenting the company kicked you........If the 2 items are unrelated, please explain, or don't mention to begin with--it's too confusing for us old guys.
2. IMHO, some problems were caused by your initial choice of words to us, when you indicated that you would continue to post and have 'fun'. A lot of us (active posters & readers) have been around CVIA since before the reverse split. Quite frankly, I've had about as much 'fun' as I can stand. Now I'm just a little 'touchy' when someone suggests that posting & reading about CVIA are 'fun'. Hopefully this will change in the next few months.
3. I do appreciate you many attempts to explain your position and the difficulties you have been having of late, but I always have questions as to when the dead horse has been beaten enough--------(sorry, this could be applied to both sides).
4. I do find it amusing that you have indicated in the past that if the contract were to fall through, you would not be interested in buying any CVIA, even though you would still be prepared to spread the good word on the company. Perhaps your choice of phrases culd be tempered to avoid problems in the future, unless of course, you only invest in companies you promote (which I doubt). However, to a lot of the folks on RB, and here, those appeared as fighting words..........By the way, I did notice that in one of your later posts, you did indicate that even if the contract fell through, you still might buy some shares of CVIA. If you would have taken this verbal position from the start, I think the response would not have been so loud.
All of course is just my opinion......OK slap away..
I perceive part of the problems you are currently having with some of the longs possibly due to your choice of wording.
1. If you feel you were 'kicked in the teeth by someone repreenting the company', I assume you are talking about the contract difficulties with the private shareholder who hird you (and the others). In many posts, you indicate that you were not hired by the company. If this is really true, please don't now imply that someone reprsenting the company kicked you........If the 2 items are unrelated, please explain, or don't mention to begin with--it's too confusing for us old guys.
2. IMHO, some problems were caused by your initial choice of words to us, when you indicated that you would continue to post and have 'fun'. A lot of us (active posters & readers) have been around CVIA since before the reverse split. Quite frankly, I've had about as much 'fun' as I can stand. Now I'm just a little 'touchy' when someone suggests that posting & reading about CVIA are 'fun'. Hopefully this will change in the next few months.
3. I do appreciate you many attempts to explain your position and the difficulties you have been having of late, but I always have questions as to when the dead horse has been beaten enough--------(sorry, this could be applied to both sides).
4. I do find it amusing that you have indicated in the past that if the contract were to fall through, you would not be interested in buying any CVIA, even though you would still be prepared to spread the good word on the company. Perhaps your choice of phrases culd be tempered to avoid problems in the future, unless of course, you only invest in companies you promote (which I doubt). However, to a lot of the folks on RB, and here, those appeared as fighting words..........By the way, I did notice that in one of your later posts, you did indicate that even if the contract fell through, you still might buy some shares of CVIA. If you would have taken this verbal position from the start, I think the response would not have been so loud.
All of course is just my opinion......OK slap away..
Join the InvestorsHub Community
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
