Wall, I could spend days debunking Popular Mechanics hit piece (if I wanted to do a thorough job), but the fact is, it would literally take days and I don't have the time. Here are some people who already have though, and there are lots more.....but this should be enough to give you the picture..... <A HREF="http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20060826165457842" target="_blank">http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20060826165457842</A> <A HREF="http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/pm/" target="_blank">http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/pm/</A> <A HREF="http://911review.com/pm/markup/index.html" target="_blank">http://911review.com/pm/markup/index.html</A> <A HREF="http://www.serendipity.li/wot/pop_mech/reply_to_popular_mechanics.htm" target="_blank">http://www.serendipity.li/wot/pop_mech/reply_to_popular_mechanics.htm</A> <A HREF="http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/august2006/100806popularmechanics.htm" target="_blank">http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/august2006/100806popularmechanics.htm</A> <A HREF="http://www.oilempire.us/popular-mechanics.html" target="_blank">http://www.oilempire.us/popular-mechanics.html</A> Right on.....this is not something they can't sweep under the rug like JFK. A big part is the admin's refusal to answer simple questions. I haven't had a chance to read or see this yet, but I'm anxious to hear what they have to say: <A HREF="http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html" target="_blank">http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html</A>