| Followers | 843 |
| Posts | 122860 |
| Boards Moderated | 9 |
| Alias Born | 09/05/2002 |
Monday, September 03, 2007 5:21:55 AM
Baraclude Studies in Progress
[Studies sponsored by BMY except as noted.]
First-line setting
Baraclude vs Tyzeka 12-week PK study in Korea
(sponsored by NVS/IDIX, 40 patients, recruiting):
http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00412529
Open-label extension of above trial out to 2 years (recruiting):
http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00467545
Baraclude vs Hepsera
(52 patients, fully enrolled)
http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00096785
Baraclude +/- Viread
(384 patients, recruiting):
http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00410072
Second-line setting
3-arm study in Lamivudine-refractory patients.
Arm A: Baraclude + Hepsera
Arm B: Baraclude monotherapy
Arm C: Hepsera monotherapy
(420 patients, recruiting):
http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00410202
Miscellaneous settings
Baraclude vs Hepsera in decompensated liver disease
(220 patients, recruiting):
http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00065507
Baraclude vs Viread/Truvada in decompensated liver disease.
Arm A: Viread
Arm B: Truvada
Arm C: Baraclude
(sponsored by GILD, 100 patients, recruiting):
http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00298363
Single–arm study of Baraclude monotherapy in patients receiving liver transplant
(70 patients, recruiting):
http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00395018
Single-arm study of Baraclude in first-line black/Hispanic patients
(80 patients, recruiting):
http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00371150
Long-term longitudinal study of Baraclude vs “physician’s choice” monotherapy
(12,500 patients, recruiting):
http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00388674
[Studies sponsored by BMY except as noted.]
First-line setting
Baraclude vs Tyzeka 12-week PK study in Korea
(sponsored by NVS/IDIX, 40 patients, recruiting):
http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00412529
Open-label extension of above trial out to 2 years (recruiting):
http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00467545
Baraclude vs Hepsera
(52 patients, fully enrolled)
http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00096785
Baraclude +/- Viread
(384 patients, recruiting):
http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00410072
Second-line setting
3-arm study in Lamivudine-refractory patients.
Arm A: Baraclude + Hepsera
Arm B: Baraclude monotherapy
Arm C: Hepsera monotherapy
(420 patients, recruiting):
http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00410202
Miscellaneous settings
Baraclude vs Hepsera in decompensated liver disease
(220 patients, recruiting):
http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00065507
Baraclude vs Viread/Truvada in decompensated liver disease.
Arm A: Viread
Arm B: Truvada
Arm C: Baraclude
(sponsored by GILD, 100 patients, recruiting):
http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00298363
Single–arm study of Baraclude monotherapy in patients receiving liver transplant
(70 patients, recruiting):
http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00395018
Single-arm study of Baraclude in first-line black/Hispanic patients
(80 patients, recruiting):
http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00371150
Long-term longitudinal study of Baraclude vs “physician’s choice” monotherapy
(12,500 patients, recruiting):
http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00388674
“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”
