REGARDING THE ASC DECISION 8-16-07 A SECTION OF THE REPORT BOTHERS ME......
"[13] In this case, we believe that the Sulja Companies' stated intention to close Sulja
Ontario's head office in Ontario and relocate to Calgary and the apparent closure of Sulja
Ontario's With that in mind, and having regard to the evidence and the conduct of the Respondents
to which the OSC Order is directed, we are persuaded that there is, prima facie, a risk of a
repetition or continuation of the same or similar conduct in Alberta. This risk is
heightened with the apparent planned move of Sulja Ontario's head office to this
province.
[14] This risk, in our view, is real and current and sufficiently serious for us to invoke
our protective power under section 198(1.1)(c) of the Act. We conclude that it is in the
public interest to make orders under section 198(1) of the character sought by Staff.
3. Scope of Orders Sought
[15] As noted, the orders sought by Staff are broader than their counterparts in the OSC
Order. Staff submitted that we have the authority to depart from a strict parallel with the
OSC Order if we consider it to be in the public interest to do so."
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
