red, You're forgetting one dynamic. Even IF their initial goal was to pay off debts via share dumping... that does NOT excuse the false financials or outrageous press releases. Or does it? You seem to think that's Ok? It means money is falsely sucked out of honest joe public, so that they can pay their debts????
Pumping the public full of BS in order to inflate share price so that debts can be paid, if that's what was done... is just as BAD a thing to do as any other reason for pumping and dumping.
Key Point: Remember the PR claiming they were ALREADY earning enough PROFITS to to list on the NAZ?? Well, if that were true... I HIGHLY doubt they'd have closed Harrow, nor would they have HAD THAT DEBT IN THE FIRST PLACE!! How the hell do so many of you overlook that simple logic? A company earning millions in NET PROFITS would NOT need to dump millions and millions of shares to pay off debt! They would USE THE PROFITS TO PAY OFF DEBTS. So, which is it... they lied about their profits, or they lied about dumping shares to pay off debt? Choose one. They used both reasons, according to many of you. Is one of those things correct? (1 - massive profits, or 2 - in debt, had to dump shares to pay it down)
Clear the cobwebs.
All Posts Are Just My Opinion