Tim, Re: Next time I see erroneous data that also has omissions to be used to construct a set of premises (wrong speed grade, different memory speeds), upon which to establish a conclusion (the Pentium M is equal or better than the AMD 64), then I guess it doesn't matter.
How about pointing it out and giving me the benefit of the doubt? I don't like it when people make the premise that my mistakes are due to deception rather than oversight.
Re: It just seemed like you were saying the comparison was an apple's to apple's comparison, when it in fact it isn't.
I was not. My comparison was to prove that Athlon 64 was not running circles around Pentium M, but rather than Pentium M could hold its own in at least some benchmarks, even with several hundred megahertz less in clock frequency. I think my data backs that up.
Re: Truce?
Sure.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
