Advanced Micro Devices Inc (AMD)

[wbmw]

Tim, Re: However, your reply may suggest a guilty conscience talking.

Damned if I do and damned if I don't I guess. You mean to sound sincere, but then again no matter how I respond you'll have a comeback. Pretty clever; yet, you say that I am the deceptive one....

By the way, coming onto an online discussion with the intention of incriminating another poster is not constructive, it is not a service, and no it does not add content, either. This is the Internet, and people should be capable of pointing out frauds on their own. I know that I don't take people for their word here, and no one else should, either. You just don't know who you're talking to; for example, you could be an imposter using the name Tim just for the sole purpose of pointing out flaws in other people's posts, discrediting them, and simply acting the part of a certified jerk.

The point is I don't know your intentions any better than you know mine, but to presume that you do is an insult and a personal attack. Looks like I made a mistake in the THG article by calling the part 1.6GHz instead of 1.7GHz, but that doesn't mean I did it deceptively. In fact, even now that we know the part is 1.7GHz, it still proves my point. I'd get into more detail with that, but I'm sure the point would be lost, since you've already changed the conversation to be about me, rather than being about the Pentium M and Athlon 64.

That's usually what people try to do when they lack a more convincing argument, but whether you meant to deceive or not isn't for me to decide....