>Is that a cut in nominal reimbursement, real reimbursement, or a cut in what reimbursements where planned to have been?<
From the context, the cited figures appear to be nominal cuts. Of course, the 40% cut by 2016 is highly unlikely to be realized. Regards, Dew
“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”