News Focus
News Focus
Followers 88
Posts 8624
Boards Moderated 3
Alias Born 06/08/2006

Re: Replevin post# 14749

Wednesday, 08/15/2007 4:11:28 AM

Wednesday, August 15, 2007 4:11:28 AM

Post# of 15765
Legal counsel appeared for the petitioning creditors, but not for Mr. Banks. The transcripts are being ordered. The judge had several concerns including the petitioning creditors inability to attend and the prospective inability of a trustee to collect with zero funds available to do so. He believed that, even though none of the petitioners were party to or could seek adjudication in the New York case, the bankruptcy was filed to thwart that proceeding. (Interesting how Corey Ribotsky said New York was where all adjudication should occur, but opposed rca's joining the suit there).

The Court dismissed the case with prejudice as to the petitioning creditors only and only until the resolution of the New York matter. So the day the New York matter is resolved, the case can be reinstated. This, of course, makes no sense because the petitioning creditors believe Netco is insolvent regardless of who loses the New York case, but there ya go. So they can spend two years fighting, one will be a winner, then back to bankruptcy court for liquidation.





Corey Ribotsky Downward Spiral NIR Group AJW board has moved to the NIR Board which is available for FREE users as well as paid subscribers. Bookmark the NIR Board to discuss: http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.asp?board_id=11792

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today