Art-Another interpretation of the PR reguarding the misrepresentation by Ellis is the fact that it reads transfering 90%, well this doesn't necessarily mean that the other 10% is the un-owned float. As we find out more information just like this morning, IMO-dollars to donuts the crook ellis wanted the remaining 10% of the shares and sold off the shell for 2K, and wanting to make his $$ selling the 10% into the surge of Appletree takeover etc. Just another perception- can anyone see why this could not be a possibility? go WNSH sp I re-posted this just incase you didn't see it!