Well i wouldnt say your wrong as such, but neither is the poster in question as such,
the matter stems from a form d filing in which the ceo listed 350k as "salaries and fees" further defined elsewhere on the form as "payments to officers, directors, and affiliates"
I suppose in all fairness until such time as the ceo explains "who" got "how much" in the next financials, we do not know same.
That being said though, it does not take much of an assumption to assume the officers/directors
(of which there seems to be only one, not-withstanding the registered agent Mr. Brandt)
would have received a lions share as opposed to the "affiliates". I would think the lions share of the 350k would have went to berman, but what do i know, I am just guessing.
As for the folks who thought this form was dated in april 2006, they are correct, however that appears to be a mistake on the part of the ceo, as it looks as if that form was amended and replaced with an april 2007 dated form.
This could very well be the amendments our little budgie was on about.
Market Data 
Markets 
