On can argue a general term "spam" based on the press release and another can argue a general term "adequacy/accuracy of PRs relating to assets and operations" based on the actual litigation.
Tiki's point is closer to the level of the issue expressed in litigation resulting from the spam campaign. If someone could actually get a hold of the "spam" info regarding AAPU, you could attempt to merge the 2 into a closer approximation of the issues AAPU needs to resolve.
How many legs does a dog have if you call the tail a leg? Four; calling a tail a leg doesn't make it a leg. Abraham Lincoln