Might some coding projects for Si & iHub remain forever at the bottom of the to-do list, and never get coded?
First a Question: Can Si & iHub, private for-profit companies, have open-sourcing projects using volunteers with no conflicts in the labor work laws?
As for the why on Si/iHub's side is to get features available in the current time frame, rather than the forever later.
The why for a person to code for free and retain no ownership could be described in the article that follows.
With the outsourcing of coding jobs from America to countries like India, more and more computer programmers will join those starving artist and musicians having non skilled day jobs as their only source of income.
As the article discusses, its a great way for a company to obtain many a person's coding & people skills when eventually a hire is planned in the near future.
Sure would increase available features very quickly.
I'am sure the Linus "tree" for controls on development activity is rock solid for modifications and builds.
The only BIG Fly in the iOintment is that the source code would be visual for anyone or any web message board company to see and copy and use for themselves. There are ways to hide such, using an object approach that contain false inputs and outputs, and the manner of how the objects are use is keep secret, as is what feature is functioned.
#msg-2117681 Researcher analyzes open source software projects ... volunteering for an open-source project can be an effective way to get a job... (or) If that URL in my post expired, then use: http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1104_2-5135027.html