Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
6,611.83
(
0.00%
)
US TECH 100
23,382.00
(
-0.67%
)
Dow Jones
46,669.88
(
0.00%
)
Brent Oil
107.85
(
0.72%
)
Bitcoin
68,396.31
(
-0.67%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 56764
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

janice shell

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 2581
Posts 328669
Boards Moderated 23
Alias Born 04/12/2001

janice shell

Member Level

Re: stockhound101 post# 40062

Sunday, 07/08/2007 5:21:06 PM

Sunday, July 08, 2007 5:21:06 PM

Post# of 56764
I won't stand by while you spin the truth by saying any shorts would not have to cover, when in fact they would have to cover or be exposed due to this action.

Please tell me WHY they would have to cover. And...you don't think a "staggering" o/s of 9 billion shares, increasing all the time, is a good enough reason for PAIM's low stock price?
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Detailed Quote