Sulja Bros. Building Supplies, Ltd (SLJB)

[boogaloo]

ed, I agree. Reasonable post. And I also agree it'll be nice when we finally get some factual rulings (either way).

I don't claim to know what's going on behind the scenes. You missed the thread... I was discussing WHY I feel the seek and destroy PR was factually incorrect, and Grande was disagreeing but in a non-specific manner. Or, maybe more specifically I should see that PR is incorrect "now"/present-day:
1) The company itself never filed suit
2) Even the PV suit is moot now as well, until the plaintiff takes further action.

I assume that since suits are a matter of record, it would be easy to disprove my previous post in which I described the 2nd-hand (admittedly) stuff I heard about. It would help with knowing the truth. It is my belief that it's correct, but I don't claim to know. However, I am referencing things which should be somewhat easily verified or disproven.