InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,163.46
(
0.70%
)
US TECH 100
17,526.80
(
0.62%
)
Dow Jones
38,795.14
(
0.31%
)
Brent Oil
83.01
(
-0.14%
)
Bitcoin
63,114.37
(
-1.38%
)
Post# of 15765
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

serfdom

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 284
Posts 43844
Boards Moderated 6
Alias Born 02/22/2005

serfdom

Re: stockefeller post# 12505

Wednesday, 06/27/2007 8:13:37 PM

Wednesday, June 27, 2007 8:13:37 PM

Post# of 15765
According to some peeps I spoke with, there are two sides to this motion by Ribotsky..

1. He doesn't want an examination of Netco's assets because it might turn out that AJW/NIR/New Millenium had some sort of financial responsibility or control via preferred shares.

-OR-

2. He wants to keep the company trading so he can keep selling his converted shares.

Good stocks are obvious. Extensive DD is how you convince yourself to buy a bad one.

>^..^<
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/board.asp?board_id=3961

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up