you have some good points with re to why there was no attempt to take out the flight that hit the pentagon, and Minetta's statement about Cheney... but these are still just nothing but "questions", "what if's"... pure speculation
could pure incompetence explain a lot of it?
some other points you bring up are totally false, such as
you must also believe that WTC #7 fell as a result of fire only
this is not true... WTC 7 was pummeled by HUGE sections of the towers falling from great heights
and if you buy into the theory of controlled demo for WTC7 then you fall more down the rabbit hole of lunacy because then you have to totally ignore the documented eyewitness testimony of firefighters and other emergency personnel who decided to "pull" away from the area because imminent collapse appeared inevitable
another point that 'one must be nuts' to believe "19 people with box-cutters hijacked 4 airplanes successfully" does not make any sense to me... how hard do you think it is to hijack an aircraft? especially pre-9/11... heck, even today i don't think it would be too difficult... the hijackers also claimed to have a bomb, whether or not it was fake is kinda beside the point... if 4 knife wielding persons have taken control of the cockpit of an airliner and one of them claims to have a bomb then that's about all it takes
another point re "only time 3 steel framed building ever crashed like that" is true but you fail to mention that no other steel framed buildings had every been hit by hijacked airliners traveling at such speed to literally slice from one side of the building to another
i don't care what ONE architect said about the towers were supposedly able to withstand a 707 striking it... he obviously didn't know what the F he was talking about
AI
Market Data 
Markets 
