Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
6,581.00
(
1.15%
)
US TECH 100
23,579.34
(
1.28%
)
Dow Jones
46,208.47
(
1.38%
)
Brent Oil
99.69
(
2.99%
)
Bitcoin
70,538.00
(
-0.51%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 12660
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

p3analyze

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 9
Posts 957
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/16/2006

p3analyze

Re: stuck_holder post# 4208

Saturday, 06/09/2007 9:42:23 PM

Saturday, June 09, 2007 9:42:23 PM

Post# of 12660
The lack of 483 disclosure was only an issue for those who bought prior to 5/9. The 75-million bond subscribers however are fully aware of there is problem with CMC. So why would the lawsuit have any effect on the current financing?

Nevertheless, the 483 thing explains why the company did not do a secondary prior to 5/9, can you imagine the outcry if that had been done?
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today