Tuesday, June 05, 2007 11:51:13 PM
Tide,
It begins with believing Frudakis is a man of his word, in the big picture he drew for us years ago, or not!
Even the biggies ran up dead alleyways sure they were onto something paradigmatic. Their stockholders paid a whole lot more for their foibles than we have paid for DNAG's missteps.
I believe Frudakis was sincere, met and lost his virginity to an unscrupulous Tampa Bay, learned an expensive lesson, and moved on.
I have a suspended judgement about Gabriel, leaning toward the
opportunist label. Chris's observation that the new CFO earns considerably less than Monica did, lends credence to that view.
I still think 2007 is make or break, for us, not DNAG. It will survive with or without us. Our skinned knees, bleeding beyond repair, testify to the sand crawling allegiance our nickles and hard earned dimes have paid to that now ragged flag of hope, pun intended, we unfurled in the year 2000.
In any event I hold in great contempt those individuals who for reasons of their own barometers have seen fit to credit and discredit DNAG according to what they had no idea of what they were/are talking about.
Unless you're there in that boardroom, you don't know what the hell is going on. Any claim to the contrary serves strictly the goals of the claimant.
They, as well as I, know that negative energy poured into any project in sufficient quantity, will, all by itself, destroy the project.
I knew that before I ever heard of the penny stock market. It is an absorbing blotter compared to anything else, I've ever seen.
It ends with believing Frudakis is a man of his word in the big picture he drew for us years ago, or not!
It begins with believing Frudakis is a man of his word, in the big picture he drew for us years ago, or not!
Even the biggies ran up dead alleyways sure they were onto something paradigmatic. Their stockholders paid a whole lot more for their foibles than we have paid for DNAG's missteps.
I believe Frudakis was sincere, met and lost his virginity to an unscrupulous Tampa Bay, learned an expensive lesson, and moved on.
I have a suspended judgement about Gabriel, leaning toward the
opportunist label. Chris's observation that the new CFO earns considerably less than Monica did, lends credence to that view.
I still think 2007 is make or break, for us, not DNAG. It will survive with or without us. Our skinned knees, bleeding beyond repair, testify to the sand crawling allegiance our nickles and hard earned dimes have paid to that now ragged flag of hope, pun intended, we unfurled in the year 2000.
In any event I hold in great contempt those individuals who for reasons of their own barometers have seen fit to credit and discredit DNAG according to what they had no idea of what they were/are talking about.
Unless you're there in that boardroom, you don't know what the hell is going on. Any claim to the contrary serves strictly the goals of the claimant.
They, as well as I, know that negative energy poured into any project in sufficient quantity, will, all by itself, destroy the project.
I knew that before I ever heard of the penny stock market. It is an absorbing blotter compared to anything else, I've ever seen.
It ends with believing Frudakis is a man of his word in the big picture he drew for us years ago, or not!
