Extreme Motorsports of California (fka EMOC)

[pascal30]

i can understand that
but the way it feels is like this

"its like a company announcing they will give a stock dividend, 1 extra share for each 10 that you own. say there are 500M shares, so there will be 550 after. ok great. everyone keeps his same percentage of shares in the company.

but at the same time they pay for the whole procedure, fees, consultation etc by giving 100M shares to those consultants, attorneys etc, so you end up actually owning less for a good thing they tried to do.

I just cant understand this guy PAID with shares for getting advice about how to fight the NSS situation ! If he thinks that is in best interest of his shareholders, then indeed i do not understand this.

Selling shares for new deals. OK. Selling shares for such things. Not OK. selling shares at this speed. Not ok. not even funding some through debt. Not ok.

============================================================

pascal, there is a HUGE difference, imo

if a co. sells shares to raise money to pay for various services, that is dilution, if on the other hand the co. gets service people to do work for shares that is a completely different story, I don't see how you cannot understand that.