News Focus
News Focus
Followers 0
Posts 62
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/07/2007

Re: tborges post# 5563

Thursday, 05/24/2007 6:36:59 PM

Thursday, May 24, 2007 6:36:59 PM

Post# of 12383
ENMD's situation is different from Celgene's. ENMD is in the position of an unproven, cash-burning biopharma, the kind that often announces PIII trials based on ambiguous or insufficiently warranting PII results. ENMD can't afford a rash move like that. Why jump the gun and announce PIII before properly announcing PII and letting that sink in? One step at a time. CELG (and Elan and Wyeth) are big boys --- they can get afford to scoop PII results and announce the move to PIII early. It's pretty much a blip in their overall operations. Also, they're under a lot more media scrutiny, and have a lot more at stake in keeping the PR engine pumping. Not so ENMD. Burns, imho, is playing this just right.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y