Normally, I would agree and say let's do what we can to help rebuild investor trust. But in this case, I think it would be a disservice to give any credence to a Flannery run company. We all pretty much lost our entire investment, (my average was .00077 presplit, which as you can see is $7.70 in today's share structure) but I would rather see this cause Flannery to lose the ability to continue this behavior than recoup some of my lost investment. I know I am rambling, but does this make any sense, what I am trying to say?