You're a very interesting guy, Sonystyle, give me some more interesting opinions.
What about this scenerio: A shareholder sues TSXT for fraud based on the stories about $4 million dollars when it was IBCX and other allegedly misleading PRs. Now I'm not saying he will prevail on the merits, but what will be the defense? It can't be, "We're under new management."
Here's another thing that bothers me. Why did IBCX print and allow to be dumped so many shares as to bring the price down to .0001 at the end? Why do something like that to gain what, $100,000-$200,000 at the expense of the new company's reputation. He had to know the plan at the time he did that.
Finally, why wouldn't Michelle make this deal contingent on the court dismissing Three Sixty from Becker's lawsuit, or require IBAC to be dismissed before it went further.
