News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257253
Next 10
Followers 842
Posts 122793
Boards Moderated 10
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: dewophile post# 46638

Monday, 05/14/2007 1:39:24 PM

Monday, May 14, 2007 1:39:24 PM

Post# of 257253
Re: Biogeneric terminology

>not to nitpick, and I am sure you are aware of this, but I think it is important not to lump generic biologics and follow on biologics together. generics imply non-inferiority to current standards. "follow-on biologics" represent an improvement to current agents.<

That’s not entirely correct. Follow-on biologics is an imprecise term that means different things to different people. The way the term is used by many, it includes drugs that are nearly identical to a reference drug as well as drugs that are tweaked to be somewhat better.

MAXY, who is working on the second category of drug, refers to its candidates as biosuperior, but this term has not caught on in with anyone else.

GTCB uses the term follow-on biologics to include both biosimilar and biosuperior candidates. Regards, Dew

p.s. I still don’t have an answer to the question in #46604.

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Trade Smarter with Thousands

Leverage decades of market experience shared openly.

Join Now