InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 28
Posts 711
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/31/2005

Re: janice shell post# 75686

Saturday, 05/05/2007 2:32:42 PM

Saturday, May 05, 2007 2:32:42 PM

Post# of 159753
I'd like to see Megas forced to recognize the shares in question as valid shares.

I'm sure you would, Janice. Forget for the moment that it would be unfair to the genuine shareholders of BCIT because of the massive dilution that would be forced on them. Despite the fact that they nor BCIT had anything to do with all the illegal shares on the market. BCIT has no responsibility whatsoever for the illegal shares.

You are blatantly transparent, Janice. Obviously anyone in the back pocket of the brokers or naked shorters would like to see what you describe happen. It would get the brokers off the hook for tens or hundreds of millions of dollars that it would cost them, to actually have to cover the naked shares they sold, and make the genuine shareholders pay for the damage they caused! How could ANY student of the securities industry even suggest such an idiotic and illegal action?

You claim to be a proponet of cleaning up the market and exposing frauds like CMKX. What about frauds like the brokers who created the air shares in the first place? What about frauds like the journalist who claim to be objective in their reporting and free of influence?

Only someone on the take would want to see the victims victimized! Is that really what you want to see, Janice? How much did it cost the brokers/shorters to buy you, Janice? 100 grand? 200 grand? Still a drop in the bucket compared to what it will cost them to have to cover on the open market. Let's not quibble here. How much were you worth to them?
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.