With all due respect, I see no evidence of the Yucatan BHUB creating a pretend hijacking. What document(s) are being strung together that suggests this?
In this respect, I believe the Yucatan BHUB is a "victim." I just also happen to believe that their business practice through the years has created victims (bagholders). For the BHUB MOMO post-hijack declaration, I would suspect some Yucatan related parties traded the stock up to the halt. I also believe they are setting themselves up to profit from this ordeal at current or future shareholder expense.
But, again, to be fair: Nothing I can see lends any substantive creedence to their generating the hijacking of themselves
How many legs does a dog have if you call the tail a leg? Four; calling a tail a leg doesn't make it a leg.
Abraham Lincoln
