News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257437
Next 10
Followers 843
Posts 122881
Boards Moderated 9
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: iwfal post# 46134

Friday, 05/04/2007 5:28:12 PM

Friday, May 04, 2007 5:28:12 PM

Post# of 257437
Why the WSJ is out to get Dr. Pazdur:

>I agree that the Abigail Alliance is a group that is dangerous as heck. And most WSJ articles about the FDA absolutely stink… But you have to admit that is one of the more reasonable editorials - given the sources.<

Yes—compared to some of the stuff the WSJ has printed in the past, today’s editorial is rather tepid.

A few years ago, an editor from the WSJ’s opinion pages died of colorectal cancer. He had wanted to be treated with Erbitux (which was not yet approved) and was convinced that Pazdur had cut off his access to the only drug that might have kept him alive. The WSJ’s editorial page has been on an anti-Pazdur vendetta ever since.

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today