InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 84
Posts 3499
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/01/2001

Re: Francois+Goelo post# 12705

Thursday, 09/27/2001 2:56:11 AM

Thursday, September 27, 2001 2:56:11 AM

Post# of 15369
F&G, your interpretation as to my meaning is incorrect. Maybe that is the same problem you have with many instances your conjecture. I meant that you bailed out in some cases by just abandoning conversation, a position, etc. after hyping a stock strongly in some cases I personally commited to. Did you ever own, short, sell, act as a PR man on any deal - how would anyone know. I'm just reminding you of previous disappointing behavior. Do you need a list of a few? It's been consistent behavior, in retrospect, to your time here on SEVU - difference being an very active 180 turn. I could even get into emails hyping purchase of an Chinese related offering which became a disaster within hours.

The point of my response is to remind you that your evaluation of a comment might be tainted at times, even when it should have been close to home for you - like there is anyone who would even consider that any of us know with any certainty what others really do. Weak point to raise. But noticed that sentences with question marks are usually ducked.

Most of my time spent to post to you is out of frustration at the constant spamming of the same points, most on a personal basis, hoping you would learn from the perception of others that maybe you should alter your style and regain a tad of respect in time. But looks hopeless and I'll try to bite my tongue and stay off the keyboard more often.

I'LL ALSO ASK MATT WHEN WE CAN HOPE FOR AN IGNORE FUNCTION?? HAVE ASKED MANY TIMES WITH NO RESPONSE. I'll take the answer of line if that is best.
zagdad