News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257458
Next 10
Followers 77
Posts 4790
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/06/2003

Re: jellybean post# 45081

Sunday, 04/15/2007 5:54:37 PM

Sunday, April 15, 2007 5:54:37 PM

Post# of 257458
It is bad science to analyze subset data from a trial, especially one with small patient enrollment numbers.

I agree. You can't look at xover survival vs placebo wo xover. Self selected subgroups are completely unreliable so saying that this data proves something is silly.

But by the same token Sher is essentially claiming that any trial with xover is unacceptable. And that is going against a LONG history of FDA precident. There is some truth to it - but the FDA long ago chose to say it was acceptable for ETHICAL reasons. Too bad. Get over it.

BTW - There is plenty of precident for survival being given its own alpha. And for single trials being acceptable. Is it mixed? Yes, more so than xover, but all of this sturm und drang is a little overdone. This is not ground breaking precident.

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today