I was just reading through the past few posts, and something occurred to me. I think we all know that the majority of people reading this board probably don’t own shares in SEVU. There are quite a few agendas represented here, although I doubt the sum total of shares owned by all of us is significant. The part I find interesting is that many who post here spend so much time trying to discredit McBride and/or SeaView, yet the best they can do is continue to rehash ancient history and topics that have nothing to do with the company. The good news is that the company is receiving quite a bit of favorable exposure. If a new investor discovers the company, they will likely do their research which will reveal a very inexpensive stock in a company who is finally shipping their mainstream product. They may also question the recent issuance of additional shares, although the new investor may not be as upset about the dilution we have all experienced, as the new investor is benefiting from the resulting depressed share price.
My assumption for the reasons for the PP remains that I think it was the best solution when faced with production delays or disappointing sales at a time when the company simply had no money. Many here would argue the usual claims and accusations we have heard so many times, but no one with enough money to make a difference is likely to read this junk anyway. Even if they did, McBride isn’t an officer of the company, so most objective people would probably consider it and dismiss it as irrelevant.
I discovered this company after reading a very small ad in a boating magazine. I checked out the website and ordered an underwater camera and bought some stock. The company appeared to have lots of potential and the share price was cheap. As SecureView gains exposure, I expect others to do the same. I hope so, anyway.
