News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257262
Next 10
Followers 843
Posts 122802
Boards Moderated 10
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: palindromy post# 43451

Thursday, 03/22/2007 9:13:31 PM

Thursday, March 22, 2007 9:13:31 PM

Post# of 257262
Re: Norvasc case / Apotex, Mylan

>Can anybody educate the board on how Apotex can claim the 6-month exclusivity for being first to file does not hold anymore?<

Apotex is taking the position that MYL is not entitled to the six-month Hatch-Waxman exclusivity because MYL will not launch its generic Norvasc until after the patent in question was set to expire on its own on 3/25/07. I.e. the earlier than previously-expected launch of generic Norvasc will be due to PFE’s loss of the pediatric extension period (which would have run until 9/25/07) rather than the loss of the patent per se.

In my opinion, Apotex’s argument is a bluff; what Apotex actually wants is to negotiate with Mylan from a position of strength.

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today