InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 139
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/08/2002

Re: Rawnoc post# 9725

Monday, 03/12/2007 10:59:41 AM

Monday, March 12, 2007 10:59:41 AM

Post# of 19383
The message is slyer than you think. In court he would say the "no" was in response to the "gone fishing" portion; the two parts are combined with an "and" and even the portion (the dumping side) was true the whole sentence was technically not.

But then he is the "Hustler", and sure did hustle!