News Focus
News Focus
Followers 60
Posts 9803
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/30/2005

Re: EOT post# 293945

Wednesday, 05/20/2026 11:20:19 AM

Wednesday, May 20, 2026 11:20:19 AM

Post# of 294140

I said it yesterday…. They should have shown a product or attached at least one name to our spider silk before this amazing breakthrough was announced.



This is somewhat in line with what I stated Monday.

What if we are co-developing a product to make money at the retail level? That seems to be Kim's goal per PR's, filings, and history, with Spydasilk.

The NDA's would prohibit releasing names. I agree delivering fiber would be nice, but where does KBLB's responsibility start and end? If they have to deliver fabric, they aren't there yet. What does a co-development agreement entail? It is the longer road to profits, but higher profits.

A downside to this is KBLB's costs for fabrics and product, are front loaded. You seem to be speaking to front end profits. I suspect it is Kim wanting all the secrecy, but so to, I could easily see the folks on the other end wanting that secrecy too. I hope he figured getting to sales/revs accurately, and we don't need more financing.

As far as today's explanation PR, Maybe Kim needs to hire out production of a particular protein in vitro, so they can see how it performs.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent KBLB News