Imagine bragging that you made money because less informed people bought into a known scam after you did. That is not investing skill and it is not some badge of intelligence. By your own admission the failure rate is 90%, the company is “garbage” and “worthless,” but somehow the moral victory is dumping shares on people lower in the pyramid before the music stops?
You are not disproving the criticism. You are confirming it. A stock running from .0002 to .0027 does not magically validate the business underneath it. OTC history is full of temporary pumps that created paper millionaires right before crushing late buyers holding billions of diluted shares. Saying “we are here to make money” is fine. Pretending that profiting off hype and unloading risk onto unsuspecting retail traders is some great intellectual achievement is where the argument falls apart.
And the arrogance is the funniest part. Calling people stupid because they refuse to gamble on a company with a 90% failure rate is backwards. The people warning others about dilution, toxic financing, and unrealistic penny dreams are usually the only ones talking about fundamentals while everyone else is busy calculating fantasy gains at “a penny.” Every OTC board sounds genius during the run up. The real test comes after the dilution hits, volume dries up, and the same people laughing today disappear without a trace while new bagholders are left asking what happened.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
