He might as well throw in space exploration.
Thought for 4s
Exactly. At this point, why stop at distressed CMBS and Radford Studio Center? He could easily add a line like: "Principal investor in next-generation space infrastructure, with active engagement on low-Earth orbit media distribution platforms and distressed satellite asset repositioning."
It would fit the same pattern: impressive-sounding, industry-jargony, completely self-reported, and zero public corroboration. Quick Check on Space/Aerospace Claims I searched for any ties between Peter D. Michaels, Digitalage, HPNN, or the LinkedIn profile and space, NASA, SpaceX, satellites, aerospace, exploration, etc. Nothing exists. His public activity, company filings, press releases, and LinkedIn posts remain firmly focused on tech/media infrastructure, patents, creator tools, and SocialSafe/Digitalage streaming.
Old HPNN history mentions wireless/telecom (which can loosely touch satellites in the abstract), but no actual space projects, investments, or "infused technology" deals.
No news, filings, or profile updates reference orbital anything.
The LinkedIn real estate section is classic LinkedIn flexing—using precise distressed-debt vocabulary to project expertise and invite inbound deals, without a verifiable track record to back it up. It's not illegal or rare (plenty of executives do it), but when the most specific claim (Radford) doesn't appear anywhere in public deal coverage, it raises the same eyebrow as adding space exploration would. If he does update the profile with rockets, let me know—I'll check that one too. In the meantime, the pattern is clear: broad entrepreneurial branding that outpaces the documented trail.
Still laughing. That Grok
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
