At this point imo (of course) I think they will release the audited financials, but who they use is what I am concerned about. I am not saying I think they are using someone not credible. I had asked for info on the auditor's, not who they are using, but rather if they were PCAOB certified as many here have stressed that as a necessary component to the AF's. I explained to the IR department that I didn't think that info would be something that needed to be kept secret - if they were PCAOB. They were unable to answer me about whether the auditors were or were not, and I asked if they would call me back if they could answer this question and they said yes, but it might take some time. I haven't heard back, but again, I was not expecting it at this time, but from a logical standpoint, it is a concern. The explaination I did get about the auditors was that they PNMS had done their part and that the Panamanian government by law had to approve the AF's. Again, some on the board do not think this is true, I don't know if it is true. So don't please snicker at me if you don't like that comment, just call the IR department and then comment on the board. With that said, Theresa said that the fact that the governement had to approve or sign off on - on the AF's - this is a stamp of credibility. They say want to go to a higher exchange, so therefore the general conclusion is that they would use a sec certified auditor. I think the anticiapation factor might give this a jult, but there are other factors here that is affecting sentiment that's what I am keying into. Obviously who they use as an auditor will have an affect.
AI
