Tuesday, January 27, 2026 10:09:05 PM
In this statement involving the lawsuit as follows "In summary, the lawsuit asserts that NVIDIA infringes, at least, representative method claim 1 of the ‘685 Patent through its GPU-accelerated machine-learning stack. The ‘685 Patent expired on or about June 27, 2025, but the Company is seeking damages and other relief for the period for which the statute of limitations on the infringement claim has not yet expired. The Company is seeking, among other relief, trebled damages based on NVIDIA’s willful and deliberate infringement. it appears to be very powerful when defining our statement within however I wouldn't think it to be earth shattering but involving the GPU accelerated machine-learning stack it would seem to me it would be worth and in the interest to start talking to HDC about resolving the issue we have with them. It could be enough to have HDC stock trade again but I personally would shut down the company after any possible settlement. I see this as less monies than what HDC settled with Intel. I still would like to know what the agreement is between not just the attorneys representing us in the case but involving other attorneys who represent HDC in general and was Marty and others paid due monies from the last settlement? Question is it possible we still owe monies to legal concerns from any of our past lawsuits?
My thoughts or opinions
Recent HDVY News
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/21/2026 04:43:38 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 09/12/2025 08:44:23 PM
