Asia Broadband Inc (AABB)

[NotTheRealBeeny]

You’re doing the same thing again and it’s honestly painful to watch.

Nobody asked you to go hunting for “1B, 2B, 3B, 4B” like you’re playing Battleship. You’re so lost in the formatting of a document you don’t understand that you can’t follow the actual point.

Here’s the part you still can’t grasp:

OTCID requires GAAP.
GAAP requires the disclosures I listed.
AABB didn’t provide them.
End of story.

You pasted a giant block of text earlier without understanding a single line of it, and now you’re doing the same thing with a subsection that isn’t even relevant. Convertible debt? Irrelevant. Nobody claimed AABB has new convertible debt in 2025.

You’re flailing around in the margins of the document because you can’t address the actual requirements:

• GAAP requires valuation for the 23.5M intangible
• GAAP requires disclosure for the 12.6M gain
• GAAP requires proof of mineral production
• GAAP requires buyback reconciliation
• GAAP requires asset removal if something was sold
• GAAP requires creditor detail for a 7.6M settlement

These are the rules you’re dodging because you don’t know what they are or where they live.

And here’s the part that should embarrass you:

You keep demanding “exact section numbers,” but when given the governing source (ASC 360, 350, 405, 505), you don’t even recognize what you’re looking at. Instead you dive into some random header in the OTC form because that’s all you understand: headings and bold text.

This is Dunning Kruger in real time.

You think you’re proving something because you can scroll through a document and quote a letter. You’re not. You’re just confirming you have no idea what you’re reading.

The disclosures AABB is missing are required under GAAP.
OTCID requires GAAP.
You posted the rulebook that proves that.
You still don’t get it.

Come back when you can tell the difference between formatting and accounting.