News Focus
News Focus
Followers 158
Posts 40107
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/09/2013

Re: Royal Dude post# 748965

Friday, 10/10/2025 11:36:31 AM

Friday, October 10, 2025 11:36:31 AM

Post# of 749756
This is where we agree to disagree and I KNOW you're a BIG enough individual to handle that disagreement (NOT LIKE SOME HERE)

Class K's 1/40 of $ $37.50 per K's(shares) = payments
Class 19 P's = x(100 shares) x $1500(face) = $150,000


Seeing as though the K's ""WERE MARKETED AS A """ DIRECT SUBSET""" of THE P's at a 40/1 ratio as you noted (Class K's 1/40 of $ $37.50 per K's(shares) = payments ) to allow smaller investors to as well participate, one might conclude as I do that they would do the conversion of 40/1 for every K to then be a P's as you yourself indicated they are 1/40th of a p

When the company put out it's 8K and PR about the matrix it READ COMMON EQUITY and PREFERRED EQUITY...................................................................
Had the been planning on having MULTIPLE preferred such as P's and K's the PR and 8K would have read PREFERRED EQUITIES
but they did NOT refer to more than one type of preferred, but a single one..

Lawyers write things to cover ALL bases AND THEIR BUTTS and their CLIENTS BUTTS

Let's see how it all turns out, either way it will be a wind fall having come from a BK case..........


GLTA

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today