News Focus
News Focus
Followers 127
Posts 14041
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 09/21/2016

Re: fuagf post# 547390

Tuesday, 10/07/2025 8:59:01 PM

Tuesday, October 07, 2025 8:59:01 PM

Post# of 583112
?? I have no idea why that is so important to you. Like that is some qualifier. I am not defending anything beyond how the Law is written. And in my defense of said Law...I am critiquing the broadness of said Law. This is the Law:

https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title10/subtitleA/part1/chapter13&edition=prelim

§253. Interference with State and Federal law

The President, by using the militia or the armed forces, or both, or by any other means, shall take such measures as he considers necessary to suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy, if it—

(1) so hinders the execution of the laws of that State, and of the United States within the State, that any part or class of its people is deprived of a right, privilege, immunity, or protection named in the Constitution and secured by law, and the constituted authorities of that State are unable, fail, or refuse to protect that right, privilege, or immunity, or to give that protection; or

(2) opposes or obstructs the execution of the laws of the United States or impedes the course of justice under those laws.

In any situation covered by clause (1), the State shall be considered to have denied the equal protection of the laws secured by the Constitution.



As written ...there is nothing to actually defend here .... https://illinoisattorneygeneral.gov/News-Room/Current-News/Illinois%20v.%20Trump%20-%20NG%20suit%20-%2025-12174.pdf?language_id=1

So how does this platiff:

STATE OF ILLINOIS, a sovereign state; and
the CITY OF CHICAGO, an Illinois municipal
corporation,


Argue such in their favor given the broadness of what is written??

Where Real Traders Talk Markets

Join thousands of traders sharing insights, catalysts, and charts.

Join Today