Apple Rush Company Inc (APRU)

[hedge_fun]

You dodged my question. Why submit any…..

evidence ahead of time?

Using your logic, the Complaint could have simply said, the LLC owes me money.

The Answer could have been, no it doesn’t.

A complaint and an answer are required, correct?

But both were fairly specific, weren’t they?

And that’s what is before the Court, nothing else.

There’s a reason you submit filings. That way the Judge understands what is being argued ahead of time. You’re suggesting Brugg could walk in with a revised contract that removed the clause about a written extension or anything else the Judge hasn’t had time to review.

What the hearing is for is oral arguments based on what has been submitted to Court.

I’m not claiming to be smarter than the people who created the court guides. I simply understand what they created.