News Focus
News Focus
Followers 37
Posts 2948
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/11/2018

Re: danieldeubank post# 122636

Saturday, 09/27/2025 3:38:36 PM

Saturday, September 27, 2025 3:38:36 PM

Post# of 128406
Not necessarily… I think the intention of management was always to own & operate.
What I see going on- Diversity of supply -
DoD established a floor price & a need for allied 5 year supply of Scandium before Niocorp could bring on their DFARs compliant domestic supply in 2029.
Niocorp also can supply Nb, Ti & TiCl-4 & REEs but all must be proven via DFS 2025.
What should be center stage- The pentagon just announced the need to establish a secure supply (the need is real & so is the need to stockpile!!)
I think- As long as the Scandium products ( produced from this Rio supply) are manufactured in the U.S. this would work & offer those industries DFARs compliance until Niocorp’s substantial U.S. domestic supply comes online. (Note: domestic suppliers are primes! Like NioCorp)
Your question is a good one for management. I do not want them to sell, no reason I can see as they were the owner operators of MolyCorp- now (MP).
This is all in NioCorp management’s wheelhouse imho…
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NB News