Which was then followed with.
Seven Arts Entertainment Inc. (SAPX), a renowned entity in the film and music production industry, recently announced an exciting new film project through collaboration with an independent production company and a well-known sports and entertainment figure. The announcement was initially retracted following the discovery that the involved individual still had an active non-compete clause, necessitating more stringent non-disclosure agreements among all parties.
The misstep was promptly addressed, with Seven Arts clarifying that the oversight was not due to any error on their part but rather the urgency and pressure surrounding the project's announcement. To move forward, new agreements were put into place to ensure compliance with all necessary contractual obligations.
The project continues to progress as planned, with the company actively negotiating with the primary producer to bring in additional talent and resources. Furthermore, Seven Arts Entertainment has been engaging in communications with OTC Markets to ensure clarity and transparency in their public releases.
Timeline wise, you left out the follow up. So, you need to provide evidence that follows after the quote you cited. Until you provide up to date evidence your statement is false.
Maybe get a direct email as proof with the talent agent or anyone that can disprove this. Otherwise, you literally omit the evidence that counters your statement perfectly because once again you have zero grounds to prove/disprove anything.
and just for the giggles. I once again am not saying this will happen, we need receipts but until another post appears saying it fell through or successfully is going forward this is Schrodinger's box.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
