I've said it repeatedly and no one takes me up on it. Copy and paste my statement and question into a Google search and see what come up. I say responses would not differ markedly from AI's, if at all. Though you'll probably get Google's Gemini AI response first. S'ok, compare answers.
The content in AI's response struck me as reasonable BECAUSE of the caveats in its response that would occur to a reasonable, critical thinking, reader.
What in the following do you disagree with
Speed and scale: AI can generate, curate, and even create learning material at a rate and breadth never seen before. This might amplify both positive and negative effects.
Personalization: AI can tailor education, potentially improving access and equity—but also possibly deepening gaps if not implemented thoughtfully.
Critical thinking: The biggest risk may be complacency—believing AI's answers without question. But if teachers and learners treat AI as an assistant, not an oracle, the need for critical thinking grows more important, not less.