Well, it looks like it's time for me to show up on your board and smash this thing into pieces.
I see a lot of folks here who have no idea about science nor science literature. This is going to be a good one!
Let's just start right at the very basics - no scientific knowledge required.
Scam red flag number 1 and 2: When the headquarter address is a virtual office and the phone number used is not a direct line (it's even on a robocall list!).
For a "promising biotech" that does seem strange, wouldn't you say? 🤣🤣
Where is the peer-reviewed paper?
All I see are papers written and funded by Vivos. How convenient. It always appears on the OTC that biotech's love to "produce products" that never have peer-reviewed papers. I mean, after all, if this was so innovative, unique and prosperous why wouldn't any big pharma want to buy its patents or fund it? Big pharma is always searching for that next revenue generating idea.
Yet, more funding through debt and dilution? Interesting....
After looking over the patents and "research papers" it appears there is nothing special about this medical device. In fact, it's already been done before by quite a few different research institutions and biotech's/pharmaceutical companies.
Has no one ever heard of nanogels? OncoGel? Different type of radioisotopes? Cancer vaccines? Theranostics?
What this company is is nothing more than a great ruse. A mash up of different scientific research papers. I see nothing special here with their "medical device" that has not already been done decades ago.
Market Data 
Markets 
