I'm not being pumpy or scammy — I'm theorizing. It’s a valid thing to do when it comes to plays like this, so don’t start with me.
I do believe SAPX engaged in talks with Crusher Films and were backing their pitch with the Starz connection.
Now — do I believe in the deal? I don’t know. But if they were just saying “we have deals” with no proof, that’s weak. If they showed proof of Starz to Crusher, then maybe they had something real to stand on.
BUT — I also think they may have jumped the gun.
We know WWE talent are often tied to non-compete clauses. So, if SAPX was in early discussions and started “greasing the wheels” by saying, “Hey, we’ve got Starz lined up, this is gonna be huge,” and then they got a verbal nod or interest from Crusher and immediately ran to Twitter or the media with it — they may have put huge pressure on the other party.
That would force Crusher (and Adam Scherr) to immediately deny anything — not because it isn’t happening, but because it can’t be public without risking legal issues. That move also potentially frustrates Crusher Films, which is a minus for SAPX in terms of credibility.
Now, if we assume the WWE restrictions have lapsed or don’t apply anymore, and SAPX is still trying to leverage the “Starz deal” to finalize the agreement with Crusher — it all comes down to this:
Did they jump the gun too early and screw it up, or can they still secure it if the Starz claim holds up?
So, we wait. Sharp already said he filed a report to the SEC/OTC Markets — unlike the crowd yelling “scam” without action.
If this is a scam, it’s now under the microscope and could get shut down.
If there’s not enough proof, it stays in this limbo.
And if it’s all legit, then the opportunity is still alive.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
