Yet again you COULD have put your baseless assertions in the form of a question, searched/AI'd it, and almost certainly come up with the same info as below. You won't do that because you know by now that the facts are simply not on your side. The Dems DO, do better. And wishful thinking is NOT an economic policy, unless you're a conservative magical thinker.
Until then we have the current admin, hope for the best
And if you get power again, do better
The old ways sucked for the majority of the country.....
Thats a part you won't admit
Does economic inequality decline during Dem presidential administrations?
Economic inequality in the United States has generally declined or held steady during Democratic presidential administrations and increased under Republican administrations, especially in the post-World War II era.
Multiple analyses of Census Bureau data reveal that Democratic presidents have produced slightly more income growth for poor families than for rich families. This led to a modest decrease or stabilization in overall inequality during their terms. By contrast, Republican presidents have produced much larger income gains for the wealthy, resulting in substantial increases in inequality.
Specifically, in the second half of the 20th century, inequality (measured by the 80/20 income ratio) increased under all Republican presidents but declined under all but one Democratic president (Jimmy Carter).
The pattern is mostly attributed to differences in macroeconomic and tax-and-transfer policies. Democratic presidents tended to favor greater employment and income growth for lower- and middle-income Americans, while Republican administrations often prioritized reducing inflation and deregulation, which benefited the top earners.
Research shows families in the bottom 20% of the income distribution experience far faster income growth during Democratic administrations; for example, a study found income growth among the poorest was almost four times higher under Democrats than under Republicans.
These partisan differences in economic outcomes are highly statistically significant and robust over multiple decades.
However, some more recent research suggests these patterns may be less pronounced in the 21st century, possibly due to larger forces such as globalization and technology outweighing partisan policy differences, or due to the financial deregulation that took place during both Democratic (e.g., Bill Clinton) and Republican (e.g., Ronald Reagan) administrations. Overall, though, the historical record strongly supports the view that economic inequality generally declines or stabilizes under Democratic presidents, while it tends to rise under Republican ones
Perplexity.ai
AI
Market Data 
Markets 
