what part of what I said said you said zero? I said you *implied* zero or negligible
You just re-quoted what I re-quoted in the post you just replied to.
I quoted you and you only check again
if you do the math, 50 cents for a 2+4 cvr isn't showing any enthusiasm, that is showing less than 25% odds of collecting the $2 cvr.
agreed. which when i look back you did mention no enthusiasm for *the cvr*. i took the implication as no enthusiasm for the drug. maybe you were being literal but the implication for most readers (i think) was little enthusiasm for the cvr = little enthusiasm for the drug. again i simply want to point out you dont know what they allocated to the drug based on a sum of parts analysis in the 129 dollars if you did mean little enthusiasm for the drug (which is what matters after all)