What you do not include was that the reader in the chambers only listed the unclear titles of each provision, many worded not giving much clues of what they contained. Thus this is in effect to the sleepy people present to be no more understanding of each any better than not reading the bill in the first place.
I watched also, and there were very few significant exposure the normal people sitting there would fully understand. There simply was a rushed and brief reading out loud of headings. How you can claim significant exposure is generous. Plus the fact that there was split seconds between numbers. No way is that comprehensible or significant. They weren't allowing questions at that time that I can tell.